(10-13-2012, 11:17)surtek Wrote: I played this game for 20 min, and the graphics look far more shitty than the screenshots. And I am not even joking. I played 10 min on the cruiseship (4th image), it is about 1/2 of the size of nuketown in black ops 1. Imagine how small it is. I also played on another map for 10 min (1st image). The size of that map is acceptable.
The gameplay is like you would except from a cod-game, it is fine but it's nothing new. Yes there are a lot of new weapons and other stuff like how classes work, but still it is the same feeling. I liked the 20 min session but they really have to come with something new after black ops 2. And I mean: bigger maps, new gameplay etc.
Why?...
I mean, I dont want them to change COD from scratch..
It is fine how it is.. and why they should change the COD feeling? I mean thats why you buy it. Because of that(usually) awesome feeling (mw3 not included).
If they would change that, they shouldn't name it COD anymore. That's COD: A fast gameplay. And that is great. I mean. In bf3 you still have the battlefield feeling, right? Why would they change it?
The only thing, which is annoying is the same engine( well a bit improved now).
(10-13-2012, 23:24)AZUMIKKEL Wrote: MW2 had a bigger map in one of the expansion packs.. its name was Grid or something. Boring as fuck yo
I agree. CoD WaW had some really big maps too, those were boring also. (That was still better since there were 32/48/64 man servers instead of just 16, HERPDERPDERPES)