ItsMods

(10-19-2011, 20:34)Tomsen1410 Wrote: [ -> ]why not just delete after death?

So we could spam more complicated solutions and then spam again what is that solution?

See, 2 posts saying the same thing is better than one post

(10-19-2011, 21:15)4FunPlayin Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-19-2011, 20:34)Tomsen1410 Wrote: [ -> ]why not just delete after death?

So we could spam more complicated solutions and then spam again what is that solution?

See, 2 posts saying the same thing is better than one post

so true

(10-19-2011, 21:20)Tomsen1410 Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-19-2011, 21:15)4FunPlayin Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-19-2011, 20:34)Tomsen1410 Wrote: [ -> ]why not just delete after death?

So we could spam more complicated solutions and then spam again what is that solution?

See, 2 posts saying the same thing is better than one post

so true

post #12 and post #13 are the examples of double spam lol

(10-19-2011, 21:34)4FunPlayin Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-19-2011, 21:20)Tomsen1410 Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-19-2011, 21:15)4FunPlayin Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-19-2011, 20:34)Tomsen1410 Wrote: [ -> ]why not just delete after death?

So we could spam more complicated solutions and then spam again what is that solution?

See, 2 posts saying the same thing is better than one post

so true

post #12 and post #13 are the examples of double spam lol

so true!

(10-19-2011, 21:36)Tomsen1410 Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-19-2011, 21:34)4FunPlayin Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-19-2011, 21:20)Tomsen1410 Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-19-2011, 21:15)4FunPlayin Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-19-2011, 20:34)Tomsen1410 Wrote: [ -> ]why not just delete after death?

So we could spam more complicated solutions and then spam again what is that solution?

See, 2 posts saying the same thing is better than one post

so true

post #12 and post #13 are the examples of double spam lol

so true!